- introduce more lgos to better identify when PRs are filtered out
- Related to: https://github.com/mikepenz/release-changelog-builder-action/issues/939
This commit is contained in:
+5
-1
@@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ class ReleaseNotes {
|
||||
core.info(`ℹ️ Fetching PRs between dates ${fromDate.toISOString()} to ${toDate.toISOString()} for ${owner}/${repo}`);
|
||||
const pullRequestsApi = new pullRequests_1.PullRequests(octokit);
|
||||
const pullRequests = yield pullRequestsApi.getBetweenDates(owner, repo, fromDate, toDate, configuration.max_pull_requests || configuration_1.DefaultConfiguration.max_pull_requests);
|
||||
core.info(`ℹ️ Retrieved ${pullRequests.length} merged PRs for ${owner}/${repo}`);
|
||||
core.info(`ℹ️ Retrieved ${pullRequests.length} PRs for ${owner}/${repo} in date range from API`);
|
||||
const prCommits = (0, commits_1.filterCommits)(commits, configuration.exclude_merge_branches || configuration_1.DefaultConfiguration.exclude_merge_branches);
|
||||
core.info(`ℹ️ Retrieved ${prCommits.length} release commits for ${owner}/${repo}`);
|
||||
// create array of commits for this release
|
||||
@@ -843,6 +843,7 @@ class ReleaseNotes {
|
||||
const mergedPullRequests = pullRequests.filter(pr => {
|
||||
return releaseCommitHashes.includes(pr.mergeCommitSha);
|
||||
});
|
||||
core.info(`ℹ️ Retrieved ${mergedPullRequests.length} merged PRs for ${owner}/${repo}`);
|
||||
let allPullRequests = mergedPullRequests;
|
||||
if (includeOpen) {
|
||||
// retrieve all open pull requests
|
||||
@@ -866,6 +867,9 @@ class ReleaseNotes {
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (baseBranches.length !== 0) {
|
||||
core.info(`ℹ️ Retrieved ${mergedPullRequests.length} PRs for ${owner}/${repo} filtered by the 'base_branches' configuration.`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (fetchReviewers) {
|
||||
core.info(`ℹ️ Fetching reviewers was enabled`);
|
||||
// update PR information with reviewers who approved
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
Reference in New Issue
Block a user